Testing Sewage to Gauge Spread of Coronavirus

Given the shortage of COVID-19 testing, it’s hard for any community to gauge how widespread the disease has truly become. Now, researchers in places as far-flung as Montana, Paris, and the Netherlands are using a proxy: measuring levels of the coronavirus in untreated sewage to see how much the infection is circulating among people.

“This is a really effective way to do surveillance,” says Blake Wiedenheft, PhD, an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at Montana State University in Bozeman. The virus has been found in the feces of patients who have tested positive.

Montana reported its first case of COVID-19 on March 12. Gov. Steve Bullock ordered the state’s residents to stay home beginning on March 28.

Aware that the coronavirus (also called SARS-CoV-2) is shed in feces, Wiedenheft and his fellow researchers decided to collect wastewater samples from the Bozeman municipal wastewater treatment plant, which serves the city’s roughly 48,000 residents. They drew the samples from March 23 to April 8.

Then the researchers used the same type of test done in people to detect SARS-CoV-2 levels in the wastewater, with the assumption that the higher the levels, the greater the number of infections in the community.

From March 30 to April 1, they found a significant increase in viral levels.

Then about a week after the governor’s mandate, the levels dropped gradually from April 3 to 6, suggesting the virus was becoming less widespread in the community.

“I think it’s pretty encouraging that the numbers in Bozeman have dipped,” Wiedenheft says. To him, it was a sign that the stay-at-home order was working to curtail the spread of the illness.

The researchers’ study has not yet been peer-reviewed.

Similar efforts to analyze sewage for SARS-CoV-2 are happening around the globe. For example, researchers in Paris sampled wastewater for more than a month and found that a rise and fall in virus concentrations corresponded to an increase in cases, followed by a reduction after the city shut down.

According to a recent article in Nature, more than a dozen research groups in various countries have begun analyzing wastewater to detect levels of SARS-CoV-2. Monitoring wastewater has the potential to provide better estimates of actual viral load in a community because it detects virus from untested people and those with infections who have mild or symptoms or no symptoms at all. But it shouldn’t take away resources from testing individuals, the article says.

While wastewater monitoring provides a general picture, including trends, it can’t yet accurately estimate how many people are infected, Wiedenheft says. Being able to figure that out is complicated because it includes a number of factors, such as how long the virus lives in wastewater and how much virus is being released by a specific person.

“At this point, we can’t make that leap.”

That’s one of the big challenges that researchers hope to tackle, he says. “To be able to do that would be extremely powerful.”

But Wiedenheft and his team were able to trace the “viral ancestry” of the samples. “Our limited sequencing suggests that there’s a single prevalent strain that’s circulating in this community,” he says. Most strains in Bozeman had originated from France, with some from Iceland. Whether a Bozeman resident went to France or a French citizen visited Bozeman is unknown, Wiedenheft says, or more likely, the strain could have already been circulating within the U.S.

Wastewater analysis can also give policymakers information as they decide when to lift shelter orders, according to Wiedenheft. “The concern happening around the country and the globe is this tension about when it’s the right time to lift the shelter-in-place order and when will we know that it’s appropriate to reinstate that order,” he says. “I really think the wastewater testing is a data-based information point, a way to inform those decisions.”

Detecting rising levels of the virus in wastewater could also serve as a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive early warning tool for new or second-wave outbreaks. “If we see [the coronavirus] come back,” Wiedenheft says, “that’s going to be really important information to provide to the policymakers — to ask if it’s time to reinstate the shelter-in-place order that seems to have been so effective.”

Published in WebMD.com, 2020
No Comments Yet

Comments are closed

All Content Copyright Katherine Kam, 2024